•  
  •  
 

LATIN Neurosurgery Journal

Document Type

Original Article

Abstract

Introduction: Stereotactic brain biopsy has become a useful surgical tool in the diagnosis and classification of brain lesions that, due to their characteristics, are not suitable for complete surgical resection. It has been proposed that its diagnostic performance increases when intraoperative cytological evaluation is performed.

Materials and Methods: Retrospective analysis of 160 consecutive patients undergoing stereotactic brain biopsy with intraoperative evaluation by neuropathology to ensure sample sufficiency and positivity for diagnosis.

Results: Histological diagnosis was achieved in 153 of the 160 cases (diagnostic yield of 95.6%). 80.63% of the lesions corresponded to neoplastic lineage, of which 53% were high-grade gliomas.

Conclusions: The sensitivity of stereotactic biopsy increases when strategies such as intraoperative cytological evaluation are used, allowing for a higher diagnostic yield reported between 97 – 99.2% in different series.

References

[1] Michael LJ Apuzzo, Parakrama T Chandrasoma, Deirdre Cohen, Chi-Shing Zee, and Vladimir Zelman. Computed imaging stereotaxy: experience and perspective related to 500 procedures applied to brain masses. Neurosurgery, 20(6):930–937, 1987.

[2] Michael LJ Apuzzo, Parakrama T Chandrasoma, Vladimir Zelman, Steven L Giannotta, and Martin H Weiss. Computed tomographic guidance stereotaxis in the management of lesions of the third ventricular region. Neurosurgery, 15(4):502–508, 1984.

[3] Michael LJ Apuzzo and James K Sabshin. Computed tomographic guidance stereotaxis in the management of intracranial mass lesions. Neurosurgery, 12(3):277–285, 1983.

[4] V Rajshekhar. Current status of stereotactic biopsy. Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, 76(3-4):137–139, 2002.

[5] Beverly Henderson West. The prentice-hall encyclopedia of mathematics. (No Title), pages 119–126, 1982.

[6] C Dittmar. Uber die lage des sogenan- ¨ nten gefaesszentrums in der medulla oblongata. Bersaechs Ges Wiss Leipzig, 25:449–469, 1873.

[7] Edward I Kandel and Yuri V Schavinsky. Stereotaxic apparatus and operations in russia in the 19th century. Journal of neurosurgery, 37(4):407–411, 1972.

[8] D. Zernov. L’encephalometre. ` Rev Gen Clin Ther, 19:302, 1980.

[9] V. Horsley and R. Clarke. Structure and functions of the cerebellum examined by a new method. Brain Science, 106:349–350, 1947.

[10] Armando J. A. Basso. Neurocirug´ıa aspectos cl´ınicos y quirurgicos ´ , chapter 64, page 694. Editorial, Lugar de publicacion, primera ´ edicion edition, 2010. Cap ´ ´ıtulo escrito por Jorge Mandolesi.

[11] Pablo Hernandez, Fernando Mart ´ ´ınez, and Rodrigo Moragues. Importancia de la biopsia estereotaxica en el diagn ´ ostico de lesiones ´ encefalicas. ´ Revista Medica del Uruguay ´ , 25(3), September 2009.

[12] M. Gelabert-Gonzalez. Hemorragia intracere- ´ bral diferida tras biopsia estereotactica. ´ Neurocirug´ıa, 18(1), February 2007.

[13] Gerardo Lopez Flores, Erick Guerra ´ Figueredo, Ramses Fernandez Melo, ´ Wilberto Bouza Molina, Barbara Estupi ´ n˜an, ´ and Jose Jord ´ an. Biopsia estereot ´ axica de ´ lesiones intracraneales. revision del tema. ´ Revista Mexicana de Neurociencia, 2(1), 2001.

Share

COinS